A famous Islamic hadith prophecy about conquering Constantinople, long attributed to Mehmed II's 1453 victory, originated as motivational propaganda during an earlier failed Umayyad siege in 717 CE.
This refutation highlights that Muhammad, while chosen as a messenger of God, was not granted knowledge of the unseen, particularly future events, in-line with 7:188, and 46:9.
The alleged prophecy of a thirty-year caliphate followed by monarchy emerges from a hadith whose sole transmitter, Sa'id ibn Juhman, was extensively criticized by classical scholars, undermining its authenticity.
Awf ibn Malik likely fabricated the hadith, using his firsthand experiences, long life, and esteemed status to retroactively align personal observations with events, presenting them as prophetic predictions.
ʿAbbād ibn Yaʿqūb led a double life, appearing as a trustworthy Sunni narrator while secretly holding and transmitting Twelver Shi'i beliefs, raising serious questions about early hadith collection methodology's reliability.
This fabricated hadith claims that the idol of Daus would reemerge near the end of times. However, we find that this prophecy was later back-projected onto the Prophet by Ibn Shihab Al-Zuhri.
Apologists claim that the hadith represents divine revelation due to the prophetic nature of certain narratives within the corpus. This article refutes the prophecy regarding the afflictions that were allegedly foretold after the predicted murder of Umar ibn al-Khattab.
Self-Proclaimed Sunni Historian on X challenges anyone: 'Show me one Rafidi Shia in the chains of al-Bukhari!' Well sir, here's a mini-compilation.
This article argues that the Muwatta of Imam Malik does not provide a complete guide to prayer, emphasizing that Muslims learned prayer through communal practices, not through hadith collections.